Synento vs 100ms
100ms is a WebRTC video SDK with dashboard templates, roles and built-in recording modes that drop files into your own storage. Synento is narrower: no templates or roles, with recording as a property of the architecture rather than a mode to pick.
| Aspect | Synento | 100ms |
|---|---|---|
| Latency model | Relayed over WebSocket from a single region: higher than peer-to-peer WebRTC | Real-time WebRTC rooms through a selective-forwarding server |
| Recording model | Built in: the live session is the recording, replayable immediately with no mode to choose | Built-in modes: composite recordings or per-track files to your own bucket, picked per use case |
| Roles and templates | None: sessions, participants and your own app logic | Yes: roles and templates configured from the dashboard |
| Browser support | Chrome/Edge 94+, Safari 16.4+ (iOS with caveats), Firefox 133+; checked by the SDK before joining | Any browser with WebRTC, plus native mobile SDKs |
| Pricing shape | Participant-minutes and storage, plus replay and MP4 exports past the allowance; no separate recording rate | Per-participant conferencing minutes with recording and streaming metered separately |
| Agent / MCP | Remote MCP server provisions and verifies via the session manifest | SDKs, APIs and dashboard; verification is watching the call or fetching the recording |
Choose Synento when…
- You want recording with no mode to pick and no bucket to configure.
- Replay inside your product matters more than dashboard templates.
- You want an agent to integrate and verify the setup on its own.
Choose 100ms when…
- You want roles, templates and a dashboard-led setup.
- You need per-track files in your own bucket as the primary output.
- The lowest possible latency is a hard product requirement.
Competitor details were checked against their public documentation and pricing in October 2026, and their plans change. Think we have described 100ms unfairly? Tell us and we will correct it.
How verification works
With Synento an agent does not have to trust its own integration. It reads the session manifest back: every track with a non-null start_ts carried real media, per participant, for camera, microphone and screen.
Common questions
How does recording differ?
Synento records every session by construction with nothing to configure. 100ms offers recording modes — composite or per-track files into your own storage — chosen per use case.
We need stage and backstage roles. Does Synento have them?
No. Synento has sessions and participants; roles are your app's logic. If dashboard-configured roles and templates carry the product, choose 100ms.
How does an agent verify the integration works?
With Synento the agent reads the session manifest: a track with a non-null start_ts carried real media. With a WebRTC platform the usual check is watching the call or fetching the recording.
Give your agent a video platform it can verify.
Sign up, point your agent at llms.txt, and have a recorded call running before lunch.