Skip to content

Compare

Choose the right tool, even when it isn't us

Three honest comparisons against the platforms teams ask about most. Each one says plainly when the other product is the better fit.

What the tables compare

  • Latency model: relayed WebSocket streams against real-time WebRTC paths.

  • Recording model: built-in durable streams against add-on recording or archiving.

  • Self-hosting and operations: fully hosted against self-hostable cores.

  • Telephony and SIP: where dial-in matters and where it does not exist.

  • Browser support: WebCodecs reach against WebRTC reach.

  • Pricing shape: participant-minutes and storage against per-minute, egress and archive meters.

  • Agent and MCP integration: verify-via-manifest against dashboard-led setup.

How these comparisons are written

Competitor details were checked against their public documentation and pricing in October 2026, and their plans change. We keep claims general on purpose: a stale specific is worse than an honest generality. Think we have described someone unfairly? Tell us and we will correct it.

Competitor details were checked against their public documentation and pricing in October 2026, and their plans change. Think we have described Synento unfairly? Tell us and we will correct it.

Give your agent a video platform it can verify.

Sign up, point your agent at llms.txt, and have a recorded call running before lunch.